Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus A68HM-K (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181017
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '19 at 08:15
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka) 8,083 User benchmarks, average bench 35% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Memory 57.9 1-Core 63.4 2-Core 61 41% 60.8 Pts	4-Core 90.2 8-Core 98.8 12% 94.5 Pts	64-Core 99.6 6% 99.6 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 4,872 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 85CB) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Lighting 4.83 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 6.44 4% 5.91 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GB 2,389 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0302A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 48 41 42 36 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 389 Write 321 Mixed 169 SusWrite 53.1 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 9.7 78% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 76.3 DQ Mixed 19 41% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 769GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 126 127 128 128 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 160 Write 124 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 125 78% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38 3,190 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2GB free Firmware: ST1OA31B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 57.8 Write 59 Mixed 30.3 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 60%
JetFlash TS32GJF500 32GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 28GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 27 25 27 26 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 8 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 25.7 25% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3 202% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x4GB 3,879 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.8% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 8.3 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	79x
Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples	76x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	58x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	68x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	115x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	63x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16