| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
| Graphics | 41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190313 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 12 '19 at 04:30 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | PRI-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
|
108%
Outstanding
|
104% 191 Pts
|
104% 851 Pts
|
77% 1,242 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396
Asus(1043 8676) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2355 MHz, MLim: 4110 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.4%
Average
|
2% 56.4 fps
|
119% 150 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NFS011SA31T-6007000 1TB
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 350 178 163 178 78 MB/s
|
88.2%
Excellent
|
82% 364 MB/s
|
152% 58.3 MB/s
|
97% 187 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
316GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 89 97 96 98 97 MB/s
|
67.3%
Good
|
86% 116 MB/s
|
194% 1.5 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
451GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 118 128 128 128 128 MB/s
|
68.8%
Good
|
63% 85.3 MB/s
|
221% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
85.8%
Excellent
|
85% 29.6 GB/s
|
78% 27.4 GB/s
|
79% 50.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,781 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 528x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 317x |
| Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 210x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples | 200x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 157x |
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 131x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $761 |