Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '19 at 03:26
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 91.5
51% 76 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 270
28% 226 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.6% Average
Lighting 60.2
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 88.4
49% 73.5 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 57.6
51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 73 76 78 80 79 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 180
Write 80.7
Mixed 118
SusWrite 75.1
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 19.1
70% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 20.7
16% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 400GB (2008)
486GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 49 49 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
29% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 47.7
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 49
35% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29%
Great: 45%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
416GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 80 79 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 45.3
Write 48.3
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 78.5
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback