Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '19 at 02:37
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$378
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.7% Very good
1-Core 126
2-Core 233
86% 179 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 478
56% 427 Pts
64-Core 503
34% 503 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 532
Reflection 507
Parallax 559
140% 533 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 523
Splatting 291
136% 358 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 135%
Great: 147%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP300 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$33
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM12.0 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 141 142 143 143 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 735
Write 449
Mixed 551
SusWrite 187
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 47.5
174% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 338
277% 391 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 113%
Great: 132%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
618GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 1171 1231 1295 1295 1296 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 832
Write 373
Mixed 1025
SusWrite 1,193
193% 856 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 84
298% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 269
343% 602 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 233%
Great: 272%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$160
68GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 390 389 390 391 391 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 389
Mixed 302
SusWrite 390
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 42.9
169% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 142
161% 276 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
383GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 427 424 434 432 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 471
Mixed 305
SusWrite 425
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 41.6
160% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 68.5
130% 260 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 187 186 186 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 165
Mixed 85
SusWrite 185
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 22.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69%
Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 17,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,341
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback