Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B75M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140707
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 18:19
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 518
60% 465 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1435 MHz, MLim: 2150 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 78
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 100
64% 83 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 78
Splatting 61.2
57% 71.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 146 68 147 90 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 363
Write 109
Mixed 194
SusWrite 142
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 31.2
112% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 198
164% 233 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 90%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
896GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 66 68 68 68 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
895GB free
Firmware: 16.01H16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 68 67 67 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 184
Write 184
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 67.9
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
143GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 73.8
Write 74.5
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 62.9
80% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/2G Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 GR1333D364L9/4G 830B M2X4G64CB88B7N-DG 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback