Dell Latitude E6510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6510  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 02K3Y4
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 15:32
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5 M 540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 45.3
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 30.9
23% 31.5 Pts
4-Core 41.8
8-Core 49.8
6% 45.8 Pts
64-Core 49.9
3% 49.9 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Dell(1028 040B) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$36
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 28 18 22 36 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 46.5
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 24.8
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 59%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
49GB free, PID 0121
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 4.2 3.9 2.1 6.9 3.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.3
Write 0.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 3.7
7% 6.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 10%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
19GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 6.1 6.1 6 6.1 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Read 9.8
Write 7.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 5.9
9% 7.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Latitude E6510 Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $70
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback