Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 02:21
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$530
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
101% 214 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,127
105% 849 Pts
64-Core 2,367
159% 2,367 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2267 617 618 613 615 617 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,583
Write 2360
Mixed 1,481
SusWrite 891
408% 1,829 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 100
344% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,402
DQ Write 1,292
DQ Mixed 1322
999% 1,338 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 324%
Great: 324%
Kingston A400 240GB-$32
184GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 233 358 233 361 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 217
Write 97.2
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 295
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 11.3
48% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 96%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$37
231GB free
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1078 1073 1064 128 139 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,707
Write 1,077
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 604
245% 1,101 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 52
279% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 1034
DQ Mixed 276
375% 672 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 226%
Great: 208%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$70
163GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 114 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 127
Write 105
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 114
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.3
223% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$33
395GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 66 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 62
Write 65.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 65.3
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 138 147 148 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 87.2
Write 134
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 140
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 91%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 147 147 148 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 175
Write 176
Mixed 128
SusWrite 147
210% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 55.2
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 51.1
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 45.1
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 140%
Great: 131%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,253
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback