Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '19 at 21:47
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 85.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 235 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 708 73% 587 Pts	64-Core 956 59% 956 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 86%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 526ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 162 163 161 153 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 363 Write 203 Mixed 254 SusWrite 155 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 41 144% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 179 140% 194 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 87%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 144GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 473 472 475 474 474 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 472 Mixed 398 SusWrite 472 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 60.1 202% 71.5 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 368 277% 369 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 927GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 186 186 188 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 171 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 187 112% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 238GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 111 111 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 99.5 Write 100 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 112 69% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB 30,532 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 35.7 MC Mixed 34.7 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 37.7 SC Mixed 29.2 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,385x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	806x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	470x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	423x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	294x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	151x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	387x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16