Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook S15 X510UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510UF
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 19:50
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.9% Very good
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
74% 157 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 414
57% 415 Pts
64-Core 323
22% 323 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 71%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
669GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU000J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 124 124 122 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 128
Write 124
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 124
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
40% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook S15 X510UF Builds (Compare 1,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback