Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 15:46
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 266
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 799
82% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2730 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.7% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 62.2
54% 68.3 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 86.5
68% 82.5 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 211 213 215 212 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 315
Mixed 216
SusWrite 217
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 47.1
169% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 271
215% 302 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 104%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
100GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 280 281 280 280 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 468
Mixed 393
SusWrite 293
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 53.6
186% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 234
209% 315 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
704GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 144 147 145 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 165
Mixed 122
SusWrite 145
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 73 108 103 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 35
Write 101
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 89.2
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 44.3
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 23.3
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback