Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '19 at 10:33
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 89.5 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 652 72% 566 Pts	64-Core 667 41% 667 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 375A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.4% Very good	Lighting 102 Reflection 92.5 Parallax 84.9 83% 93 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 87.4 Splatting 80 73% 90.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$46 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 343 344 346 348 348 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 479 Write 349 Mixed 288 SusWrite 342 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 28.9 108% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 216 166% 218 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 128%
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB 7,178 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 113GB free Firmware: CA12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 56 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 65.3 Write 59.5 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 55.7 41% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KD48GU880-32A160T 2x8GB 1,652 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.4% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 21.9 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 21.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	651x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	205x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	169x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	114x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	111x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	65x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	95x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $544

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16