Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
14 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 07:51
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 192
76% 127 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 356
47% 348 Pts
64-Core 350
24% 350 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 87.6
Reflection 80.3
Parallax 72.8
72% 80.2 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 74.7
41% 72.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2512G 512GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 104 120 131 133 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 379
Write 330
Mixed 281
SusWrite 122
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$82
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 106 130 132 134 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 188
Write 148
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 125
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 115%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
695GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 83.5
Write 47.7
Mixed 43
SusWrite 103
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$59
97GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 93 95 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 96.5
Mixed 62
SusWrite 91.1
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 69%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
390GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 62 66 68 67 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 44.5
Write 43
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 66.6
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
366GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 100 103 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 103
115% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $403
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback