PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H97M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150727 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 10 '19 at 01:39 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 73% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
66.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$104
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
87.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 364 378 317 344 370 MB/s
|
88.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung HM100UI 1TB-$47
781GB free
Firmware: 2AM10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 77 78 78 78 76 MB/s
|
42.8%
Average
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 152 123 94 111 104 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
114GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
46.3%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 176x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 154x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 153x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 106x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 77x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $674 |