Medion Erazer X7841 MD99556

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMedion Erazer X7841 MD99556  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RE1M
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '19 at 21:30
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.9% Good
1-Core 104
2-Core 194
71% 149 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 509
54% 420 Pts
64-Core 507
34% 507 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
Clevo(1558 6780) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
43.4% Average
Lighting 162
Reflection 140
Parallax 156
43% 153 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 155
Splatting 118
44% 133 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 45%
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 22
6% 23.3 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 32.8
5% 23.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 437 417 437 435 425 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 420
Mixed 267
SusWrite 431
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 30.1
117% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 64.2
121% 243 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
926GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 0 0 86 127 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Write 132
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 65.4
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75%
Great: 75%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Erazer X7841 MD99556 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Medion Erazer X7841 MD99556

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback