HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DB
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190221
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '19 at 19:23
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 220
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 655
72% 570 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1503
Write 1,201
Mixed 726
253% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 66.7
222% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 911
DQ Mixed 951
747% 1,041 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
701GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 130 132 129 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 130
Write 97.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 129
69% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 13.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,689 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback