Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 142%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 09 '19 at 18:48
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9700K
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
108% 229 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,207
112% 906 Pts
64-Core 1,208
81% 1,208 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$445
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Lighting 454
Reflection 349
Parallax 446
117% 416 fps
MRender 431
Gravity 421
Splatting 253
117% 368 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$71
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 651 407 408 408 409 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,566
Write 2,264
Mixed 1,509
SusWrite 539
383% 1,719 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 83.5
281% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 1640
DQ Mixed 1,166
928% 1,271 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 282%
Great: 289%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$128
112GB free
Firmware: 526ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 161 167 168 170 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 374
Write 208
Mixed 257
SusWrite 163
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 52.8
186% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 208
154% 203 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 87%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
690GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 494 495 495 495 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 492
Mixed 447
SusWrite 494
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 71.4
242% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 142%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
672GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 494 495 495 495 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 493
Mixed 462
SusWrite 494
111% 492 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 70.3
239% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 142%
Great: 134%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$106
110GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 131 132 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 378
Mixed 352
SusWrite 173
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 61.5
222% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 319
251% 347 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 116%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB-$259
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 31.9
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 35
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 45.1
89% 45.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 114%
Great: 121%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 5,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 140%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $241

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,971
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $234Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback