Asrock H61M-VS3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-VS3 (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '19 at 10:35
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 165 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 289 33% 259 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gainward(10B0 1C81) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 31.7 28% 30.7 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 32.7 Splatting 32 28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4727 Write 4,507 Mixed 4,561 1,028% 4,598 MB/s	4K Read 300 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 183 768% 211 MB/s	DQ Read 1,018 DQ Write 834 DQ Mixed 912 687% 921 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 185GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 86 85 83 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 13 Write 48.3 Mixed 51 SusWrite 84.2 37% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 17.7 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-VS3 Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS3

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	38x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	31x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	23x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	64x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	18x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	6x
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x
HX316C10F/8 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 591 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $88

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16