Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170915
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 08 '19 at 08:47
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 218
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 739
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3717) ≥ 4GB; MSI Seahawk EK
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 193
Reflection 236
Parallax 255
157% 228 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 226
Splatting 144
162% 207 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 147%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1113 1037 957 954 918 915 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,910
Write 1,282
Mixed 721
SusWrite 982
272% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 56.5
181% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 456
383% 571 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 221%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
52GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 119 102 99 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 460
Mixed 390
SusWrite 131
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 41.8
152% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
342GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 456 459 463 458 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 448
Mixed 353
SusWrite 455
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 41.3
145% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 352
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
34GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 235 227 219 206 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 295
Mixed 322
SusWrite 227
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 38
145% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 124%
SRT USB 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 3.2 6.6 4.2 5.7 5 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Read 28
Write 1.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.1
11% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 42.9
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 20.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $864
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback