Shinelon CP15S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemShinelon CP15S  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P15SM-A/SM1-A
Memory3.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20141114
Uptime9 Days
Run DateOct 08 '19 at 04:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 70%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.4% Below average
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 85
32% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 231
25% 196 Pts
64-Core 235
16% 235 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 5281) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 81.6
Parallax 97.4
21% 85.2 fps
MRender 93.2
Gravity 122
Splatting 89.2
32% 101 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 33%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
RHDM2DDHPFA-E3C8 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 208 228 219 222 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
Read 406
Write 250
Mixed 290
SusWrite 228
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 17.4
72% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 193
162% 236 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 78%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
286GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 77 75 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 78.8
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 75.4
43% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CP15S Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Shinelon CP15S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback