Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 98.3 2-Core 193 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 579 59% 477 Pts	64-Core 705 44% 705 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 310 297 313 307 258 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 449 Write 426 Mixed 406 SusWrite 303 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 35.2 114% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 253 191% 258 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 500GB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 111GB free Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 322 313 312 312 313 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 442 Write 423 Mixed 408 SusWrite 334 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 38 119% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 253 192% 259 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U7CFR8C-PB 8x2GB 152 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 33.8 106% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	495x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16