Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '19 at 19:22
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 153 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 483 50% 400 Pts	64-Core 486 30% 486 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Device(0000 0000) 3GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)	55.1% Above average	Lighting 67.9 Reflection 66 Parallax 57.9 55% 63.9 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 64.5 Splatting 67.6 55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 310 21 74 54 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 486 Write 437 Mixed 373 SusWrite 127 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 46.8 156% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 191 160% 232 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 126%
OCZ PETROL 128GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 21GB free Firmware: 3.15.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 148 137 126 108 MB/s Performing below potential (84^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.2% Average	Read 269 Write 164 Mixed 154 SusWrite 138 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 17.9 69% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 61.6 DQ Mixed 59.8 52% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 46%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 625GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 100 99 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 71.7 Write 63.3 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 99.3 53% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 657GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 145 150 150 149 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	79% Very good	Read 128 Write 144 Mixed 20 SusWrite 147 79% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 211GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 93 93 93 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 89 Write 92.8 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 92.2 60% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM3X8GA2133C11Y4 2x8GB 666 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.6% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 15.2 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 12 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16