Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime16 Days
Run DateOct 07 '19 at 15:43
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 201
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 630
64% 517 Pts
64-Core 841
52% 841 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3352) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 37.7
36% 37.8 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 35.9
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101200RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 604 605 606 611 583 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 645
Write 592
Mixed 611
SusWrite 606
138% 614 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53.7
176% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 717
535% 712 MB/s
Poor: 172%
This bench: 149%
Great: 292%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
166GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 132 129 158 156 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 439
Write 256
Mixed 320
SusWrite 182
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 16.8
71% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 40.8
48% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 56%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 124GB
18GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 5.3 5 5 4.6 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Read 31.3
Write 4.3
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 5.2
13% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
24GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 6 6.4 6 6.1 6.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 140
Write 6.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 5.8
33% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
57% 4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 28%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
51GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 21 24 25 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 156
Write 62.2
Mixed 65
SusWrite 36.9
92% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.8
154% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 42.2
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 21.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $745
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback