Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 21%
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation 24%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD/USB3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '19 at 10:10
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.9% Average
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 134
47% 100 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 267
36% 267 Pts
64-Core 270
18% 270 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 8390) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 62
16% 63.7 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 53.9
19% 60.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$32
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 108 133 161 100 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
46% Average
Read 448
Write 380
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 174
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 14.3
58% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905403-173.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 99U5403-050.A00LF 8GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 16%
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation 23%

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $153
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 580 $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback