Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 166 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 608 59% 485 Pts	64-Core 1,326 82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 1366) CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.3% Average	Lighting 49.8 Reflection 53 Parallax 47.4 41% 50 fps	MRender 57 Gravity 49.1 Splatting 42.3 40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 185 214 219 217 214 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.7% Above average	Read 221 Write 222 Mixed 200 SusWrite 213 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 22.4 72% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 159 122% 164 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 101GB free Firmware: JPFOA3BF SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 46 45 45 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 69 Write 71.5 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 44.6 41% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 50%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 256GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 237GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 30 Write 27 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 27.8 38% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.7 176% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B2K70DM0-CF8 ID:80 CE M393B2K70DM0-CF8 ID:80 CE M393B2K70DM0-CF8 ID:80 CE M393B2K70DM0-CF8 ID:80 CE M393B2K70DM0-CF8 ID:80 CE M393B2K70DM0-CF8 130GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 16.5 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.6 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16