Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 16:26
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 140
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 488
49% 386 Pts
64-Core 486
33% 486 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Gigabyte(1458 228F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 80.1
55% 68.9 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 76.3
37% 64.8 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 55%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Nvme XPG SPECTRIX S40 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB001D14 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 440 690 698 396 696 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,165
Write 744
Mixed 609
SusWrite 558
171% 769 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 60.2
197% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 489
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 445
328% 434 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 161%
Great: 283%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 105 104 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 63.2
Mixed 57
SusWrite 105
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a208
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 101
Write 108
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 111
120% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 9905471-001.A00LF Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 2,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $577
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $187Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback