HP s5761sc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP s5761sc  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '19 at 18:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 162
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 202
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 405
Device(1B0A 908E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2
2% 2.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 233 227 228 228 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.1% Good
Read 241
Write 230
Mixed 225
SusWrite 230
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 25.2
88% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 179
141% 195 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9B852C80 2C802C80 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 2C802C80 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback