Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '19 at 17:03
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 51.8 2-Core 107 55% 83.9 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 284 31% 248 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 04CF) 1GB CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.7.5 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.7% Terrible	Lighting 4.87 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 6.69 4% 5.15 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 3.22 3% 3.98 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.7% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 245 272 290 293 298 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 411 Write 198 Mixed 218 SusWrite 273 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 82.9 4K Mixed 36.8 131% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 58.2 94% 180 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 128%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47 20,548 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 250GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 216 Write 45.5 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 44.9 63% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	30% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.1 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-890GPA-UD3H Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	36x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	17x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	39x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	30x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16