HP Pegatron 2A73H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP Pegatron 2A73H  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2A73h
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '19 at 11:07
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon X5450-$299
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.9% Below average
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 109
38% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 215
29% 213 Pts
64-Core 215
14% 215 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
EVGA(3842 1561) 1GB
CLim: 938 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 65.6
18% 67.2 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 56.5
20% 64 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$25
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHF
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,954
Write 27.1
Mixed 42.9
484% 675 MB/s
4K Read 199
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.3
8,433% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 42%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
146GB free
Firmware: 0002LVM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,007
Write 28.3
Mixed 43.2
497% 693 MB/s
4K Read 246
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.5
10,411% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback