Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6276 70 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 32.2 2-Core 78 40% 60.9 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 240 23% 189 Pts	64-Core 960 59% 960 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 55%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 88 89 87 86 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 160 Write 109 Mixed 118 SusWrite 88.8 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 20.3 64% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 98.4 81% 116 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-CH9 8x4GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 8 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.9% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 10.8 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 61341stBench 43%, 47 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61281stBench 41%, 50 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	1x
Quadro FX 1700NvidiaBench 1%, 2,013 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	1x

RAM
9965525-144.A00LF 9965525-144.A00LF 9965525-144.A00LF 9965525-144.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF Hynix HMT351R7BFR8C-H... 96GBKingstonBench 26%, 5 samples	1x
9965516-070.A00LF 16x8GBKingstonBench 33%, 5 samples	1x

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $60

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16