Monster TULPAR T7 V20.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.1
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 22:23
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
86% Excellent
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
87% 184 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 748
79% 619 Pts
64-Core 932
62% 932 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1065) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 232
Parallax 26
5% 92.6 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 36.2
6% 28.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$77
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 252 250 252 253 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 840
Write 994
Mixed 913
SusWrite 289
171% 759 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 43.9
150% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 271
308% 531 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 127%
Great: 244%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$76
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 309 310 308 308 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 344
Mixed 358
SusWrite 322
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 44.4
163% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 344
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
11GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.9 5.3 4.8 4.7 5.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 37
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5
10% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Mixed 0
41% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.9
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 25.9
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80%
Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.1 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $77
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback