Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 21:46
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 980
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 115
57% 88 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 233
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 90.9
54% 75 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 56.4
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba- TR200 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 91 26 64 49 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 454
Write 379
Mixed 204
SusWrite 85.4
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 12.7
35% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37
DQ Write 42
DQ Mixed 27.2
24% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
129GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 312 311 311 312 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 442
Mixed 386
SusWrite 306
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 58.4
192% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 62.2
100% 191 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
321GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 405 413 415 381 374 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 427
Mixed 440
SusWrite 377
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 54
172% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 55.8
94% 183 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 119%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
293GB free
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 65 63 66 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 96.6
Write 45.7
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 65
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.7% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback