PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Oegstone DH55TC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Intel DH55TC |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100722 |
Uptime | 11.4 Days |
Run Date | Oct 04 '19 at 18:48 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | LTU-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3440
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
59%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 64 63 72 71 MB/s
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
159GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 79 80 79 80 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 10x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 9x |
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 5x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $398 |