HP ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81F6
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190108
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '19 at 22:55
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
26.2% Poor
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 79.4
28% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 145
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 142
10% 142 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 81F6) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.2301.1002
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 11.4
2% 10.9 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 6.6
2% 6.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 3 17 20 82 3.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 407
Write 315
Mixed 174
SusWrite 37.4
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 12.1
27% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 58%
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 69GB
11GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 12 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.5% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 13.3
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 12.1
14% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 95%
WD My Passport 259D 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 12 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Read 26.7
Write 23
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 12.2
28% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.9
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $330
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $259Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback