HP 23-q110

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP 23-q110  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B42
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 03 '19 at 17:19
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
1-Core 17
2-Core 31
11% 24 Pts
4-Core 67.8
8-Core 80.7
10% 74.2 Pts
64-Core 100
7% 100 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 2B42) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 12.7
2% 9.23 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 5.8
2% 5.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$42
638GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,152
Write 20
Mixed 21.5
285% 398 MB/s
4K Read 119
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
5,042% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 108%
Kingston DT 101 II 2GB
2GB free, PID 1625
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.7 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 4.9
8% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
30GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
9.32% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 14.5
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 4.2
16% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.1
138% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
30GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.9 9.7 9.8 8.4 9.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 9.1
14% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.1
130% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273BH1-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 0.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 50%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 23-q110 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-q110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $150
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback