Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
Motherboard	Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '19 at 02:48
Run Duration	347 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 96 1-Core 159 2-Core 287 101% 181 Pts	4-Core 636 8-Core 1,095 105% 866 Pts	64-Core 1,534 95% 1,534 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0517) CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.3 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50% Above average	Lighting 59.4 Reflection 60 Parallax 57.7 48% 59.1 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 72.1 Splatting 55.6 53% 66.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 9,880 User benchmarks, average bench 307% 2TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 540 512 78 165 116 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 1027 Write 629 Mixed 311 SusWrite 248 122% 554 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 16.9 79% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 50.1 83% 157 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 541%
SABRENT 1TB 665GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1647 892 913 915 913 924 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 477GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 101 97 101 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 138 Write 132 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 99.2 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 121 124 124 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 112 Write 121 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 123 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 101%
Seagate ST32000644NS 2TB 7,161 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 147GB free Firmware: 9122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 100 127 98 128 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 96.2 Write 94.8 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 116 68% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 74%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 1,686 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 77GB free Firmware: 050B SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 27 54 41 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 122 Write 95.3 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 50.3 62% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.7 111% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 104%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB 3,961 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 378GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 104 103 104 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 167 Write 164 Mixed 131 SusWrite 104 188% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 71%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 140 136 136 134 129 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 169 Write 186 Mixed 125 SusWrite 135 207% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.2 221% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 86%
WD My Book 1230 3TB 7,778 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 280GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 119 Write 127 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 84.2 142% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 42.4 MC Mixed 32 109% 38 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 47.4 SC Mixed 28.3 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 150%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $300

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	3,304x
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,233x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	485x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	822x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	622x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	546x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	687x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	600x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	330x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	297x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	262x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	245x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16