Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 02 '19 at 20:29
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 94.9
49% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 182
25% 183 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
EVGA(3842 3650) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 16
Parallax 21.7
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 15.1
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 61 61 64 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 178
Write 72.3
Mixed 91
SusWrite 61.5
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 19.8
70% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 72.4
62% 92.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
532GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 131 134 136 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 142
Write 82.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 135
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
465GB free
Firmware: CR100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 81 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 75.5
Write 82.3
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 81.3
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 44%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
884GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 94 93 95 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 93.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 93.5
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.1
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback