Asus X555QA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus X555QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555QA
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '19 at 09:08
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
32.1% Below average
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 88.2
33% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 180
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 193
13% 193 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 122E) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 12.7
2% 10.6 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 7.9
2% 7.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
665GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU000J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 96 78 70 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67% Good
Read 143
Write 147
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 89.1
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
200% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron MT40A512M8RH-083E:B 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 25%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X555QA Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation 21%

System: Asus X555QA

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $229Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $339Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback