MSI MS-16P5

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 36% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star GE63 Raider RGB 8RF
Motherboard	MSI MS-16P5 (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '19 at 17:34
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	36%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 71.2 37% 56.8 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 217 22% 179 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9901 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.5% Average	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 102 Parallax 77.3 31% 72.4 fps	MRender 86.5 Gravity 72.8 Splatting 89 68% 82.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB 18,615 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 151 146 142 135 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 496 Write 483 Mixed 574 SusWrite 150 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 26.5 74% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 278 203% 266 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 126%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 570GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 131 131 130 127 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	60% Good	Read 81 Write 142 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 128 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17.3 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	1,492x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	94x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	714x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	695x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	199x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	200x
RBUSNS8180S3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,961 samples	132x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	98x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	412x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	126x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16