Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 23:34
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
1-Core 130
2-Core 247
89% 189 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 748
78% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,038
70% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$148
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Lighting 115
Reflection 77.7
Parallax 118
30% 103 fps
MRender 80.2
Gravity 112
Splatting 79.4
29% 90.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 99 103 101 103 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.6% Average
Read 230
Write 75.8
Mixed 133
SusWrite 100
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 22.3
91% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 106
90% 134 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 89%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$49
456GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 134 134 134 128 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 439
Write 117
Mixed 202
SusWrite 139
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 19.7
101% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 33.3
52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$47
723GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 173 174 184 173 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 148
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 176
93% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB
465GB free, PID a208
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 102
117% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
79GB free, PID fc76
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 12 13 14 8.6 8.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Read 3
Write 8.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 11
10% 6.93 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$81
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 29.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 26.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $347
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $206Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback