Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190902
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '19 at 23:34
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 79.5 1-Core 143 2-Core 242 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 539 8-Core 762 82% 650 Pts	64-Core 1,035 64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 29.9 Parallax 36.8 31% 35 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 34.5 30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 99 103 101 103 104 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.6% Average	Read 230 Write 75.8 Mixed 133 SusWrite 100 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 22.3 91% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 90.4 DQ Mixed 106 90% 134 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 456GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 134 134 134 128 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 439 Write 117 Mixed 202 SusWrite 139 49% 224 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 95.1 4K Mixed 19.7 101% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 33.3 52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 723GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 173 174 184 173 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 148 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 176 93% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 465GB free, PID a208 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 102 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 108 Write 108 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 102 117% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 44%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 79GB free, PID fc76 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 12 13 14 8.6 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	3.75% Terrible	Read 3 Write 8.7 Mixed 5 SusWrite 11 10% 6.93 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.75% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.8% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 29.8 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 26.5 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	483x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD $210Bench 84%, 294,959 samples	160x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	155x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	92x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	46x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)