Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 22:43
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7600K-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70.3% Very good
1-Core 109
2-Core 225
78% 167 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 401
53% 392 Pts
64-Core 373
25% 373 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$170
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 32.6
3% 15.3 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 23.8
6% 16.8 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 60%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$40
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131132
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 118 203 202 153 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 312
Write 306
Mixed 223
SusWrite 169
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 24.6
88% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 96.9
87% 132 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
133GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 132 133 136 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 121
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 133
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
857GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 152 148 147 157 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 150
Write 111
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 152
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.7
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 5,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,040
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $259Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback