HP ProLiant DL180 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant DL180 Gen9  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant DL180 Gen9
Memory19 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160505
Uptime319.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 06:15
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 104
48% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 397
36% 303 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 160GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 149 114 94 128 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 220
Write 146
Mixed 153
SusWrite 125
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 17
52% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 59.7
49% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 97%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
139GB free
Firmware: 5.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 100 100 87 98 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
UNKNOWN NOT AVAILABLE 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.7% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21.6
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback