Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

System	Gigabyte H270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '19 at 03:30
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379 505,701 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Memory 93.4 1-Core 135 2-Core 270 95% 166 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 709 73% 574 Pts	64-Core 712 48% 712 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155 695,028 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 42.5 33% 38.5 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 37.5 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70 768,156 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 7,642 Write 7,163 Mixed 7,273 1,644% 7,359 MB/s	4K Read 527 4K Write 321 4K Mixed 397 1,478% 415 MB/s	DQ Read 1,399 DQ Write 1,099 DQ Mixed 1,131 878% 1,210 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$125 615,795 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 286GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 490 489 490 489 490 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 488 Mixed 404 SusWrite 490 106% 470 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 61.9 212% 77.1 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 362 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$81 10,511 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 100 Write 98 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 106 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.9% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 24.2 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 25.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,110,464 samples	55x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 695,028 samples	41x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 92,716 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $85Bench 288%, 254,466 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 105%, 768,156 samples	17x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $125Bench 111%, 615,795 samples	11x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 42,380 samples	19x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 45,945 samples	10x
Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GBHyperX $90Bench 82%, 9,992 samples	10x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $702

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16