Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte H270M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 03:30
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
95% 203 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 709
73% 574 Pts
64-Core 712
48% 712 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 122
Reflection 84.2
Parallax 136
32% 114 fps
MRender 80.5
Gravity 117
Splatting 86.2
32% 94.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$75
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 7,642
Write 7,163
Mixed 7,273
1,644% 7,359 MB/s
4K Read 527
4K Write 321
4K Mixed 397
1,478% 415 MB/s
DQ Read 1,399
DQ Write 1,099
DQ Mixed 1,131
878% 1,210 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$89
286GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 490 489 490 489 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 488
Mixed 404
SusWrite 490
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 61.9
212% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 132%
Great: 135%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$93
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 98
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 106
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.9% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.2
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-H270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $690
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback