Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

System	Gigabyte H270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '19 at 03:30
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379 341,238 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	1-Core 135 2-Core 270 95% 203 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 709 73% 574 Pts	64-Core 712 48% 712 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155 442,720 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 122 Reflection 84.2 Parallax 136 32% 114 fps	MRender 80.5 Gravity 117 Splatting 86.2 32% 94.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$75 546,937 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 7,642 Write 7,163 Mixed 7,273 1,644% 7,359 MB/s	4K Read 527 4K Write 321 4K Mixed 397 1,478% 415 MB/s	DQ Read 1,399 DQ Write 1,099 DQ Mixed 1,131 878% 1,210 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$89 450,220 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 286GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 490 489 490 489 490 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 488 Mixed 404 SusWrite 490 106% 470 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 61.9 212% 77.1 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 362 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 135%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$93 6,408 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 100 Write 98 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 106 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.9% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 24.2 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 25.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 54%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $242Bench 57%, 746,202 samples	137x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 32%, 442,720 samples	133x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 6%, 88,588 samples	103x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 203%, 156,948 samples	43x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $75Bench 106%, 546,937 samples	42x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $62Bench 71%, 60,999 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $35Bench 42%, 29,599 samples	43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 53,554 samples	42x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 34,576 samples	31x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $690

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14