Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 09:08
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 199
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 376
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.9% Good
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 80.4
Parallax 72.9
72% 80.4 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 75.7
61% 74 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2512G 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 133 134 134 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 384
Write 327
Mixed 298
SusWrite 130
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 17.8
96% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 21.1
30% 53 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 134 134 134 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 166
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 132
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
695GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 84.7
Write 83.8
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 97.5
55% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
95GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 87 80 71 81 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 93
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 85
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 68%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
205GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 73 76 74 76 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 76
Write 80.7
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 75.7
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
366GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 58 67 90 92 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 106
Write 97.3
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 78.1
102% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $405
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback