Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 09:07
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 249
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 820
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,234
76% 1,234 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.7% Very good
Lighting 110
Reflection 115
Parallax 98.3
90% 108 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 104
Splatting 0.13
48% 67.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128-11 SATA 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T87110D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 157 106 137 131 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 450
Write 402
Mixed 373
SusWrite 139
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 35.8
118% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 247
193% 266 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 87%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB
307GB free
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 481 487 490 483 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 463
Mixed 335
SusWrite 483
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 60.3
196% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
587GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 72 13 80 95 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 424
Write 261
Mixed 194
SusWrite 69.9
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 13.8
49% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 87.7
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 16.2
29% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 58%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
129GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 145 174 175 174 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 461
Write 455
Mixed 362
SusWrite 219
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 35.6
127% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 208
194% 297 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 97%
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: EXT48D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 250 252 252 251 251 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 445
Write 251
Mixed 193
SusWrite 251
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 29.5
127% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 75.6
121% 234 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.6% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.2
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback