Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive299% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 00:24
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 659
75% 574 Pts
64-Core 814
55% 814 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3630
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.6% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 125
Parallax 120
90% 119 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 92.7
85% 113 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 102%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$295
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1845 1838 1765 1860 1643 1551 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,093
Write 1,785
Mixed 1372
SusWrite 1,750
393% 1,750 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 74.4
241% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 811
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 725
550% 742 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 299%
Great: 396%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
56GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 87
Write 26
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 24.5
50% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 9.7
780% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 11.1
791% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport 2599 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2599
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 112 109 112 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 116
Write 89.7
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 110
127% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 16.7
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 22.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 6,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback