Asus Z97-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus Z97-P  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 28 '19 at 20:56
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-4690K-$168
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.4% Very good
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
80% 169 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 443
61% 445 Pts
64-Core 446
30% 446 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 50.9
Parallax 73.2
20% 66.3 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 44.4
21% 59.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$55
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 284 282 278 279 281 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 478
Mixed 375
SusWrite 295
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 53.7
176% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 260
193% 262 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 150 151 151 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 159
Write 161
Mixed 39
SusWrite 152
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 150 152 151 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 150
Write 147
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 152
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 28 28 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 22.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z97-P Builds (Compare 7,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z97-P - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $732
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback