HP OMEN Notebook PC 15

Performance Results

Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN Notebook PC 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2332
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '19 at 12:02
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 43.4
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 44.1
25% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 67.1
8-Core 99.6
11% 83.3 Pts
64-Core 115
8% 115 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
HP(103C 2332) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver.
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.69
0% 0.62 fps
MRender 0.76
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 0.96
0% 0.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 18%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A200806
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 132 132 116 123 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 367
Write 292
Mixed 156
SusWrite 142
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 12.2
42% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 111
93% 136 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical OMEN Notebook PC 15 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 62%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN Notebook PC 15

The Best.
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback