Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemIntel SandyBridge Platform
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime12.8 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 19:46
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 353
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
36GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 220 226 211 182 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.8% Very good
Read 243
Write 232
Mixed 231
SusWrite 209
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 38.4
127% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 108
105% 166 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 54 64 149 164 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 171
Write 167
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 117
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 89 9.4 9.5 11 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 182
Write 139
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 45.9
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
719GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 174 182 182 171 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 143
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 179
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 21 17 17 16 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 24.1
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 19.5
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MLK72V3N TS1GLK72V3H TS512MLK72V3N TS1GLK72V3H 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.9% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback