Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 17:25
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 235
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 366
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.2% Good
Lighting 80.2
Reflection 71.5
Parallax 55.8
65% 69.2 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 71.9
59% 72 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 73%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 31.2
35% 35 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1088 1411 836 790 844 855 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,234
Write 1,872
Mixed 1,460
SusWrite 971
365% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 92.1
308% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,209
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 924
706% 965 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 288%
Great: 355%
KINGSTON 120GB
33GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 169 165 171 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 385
Write 202
Mixed 242
SusWrite 165
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 43.6
156% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 204
152% 202 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
457GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 184 184 185 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 111
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 183
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $909
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback