Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 16:06
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$75
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.6% Poor
1-Core 58
2-Core 87.8
36% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 132
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$346
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Lighting 304
Reflection 286
Parallax 300
80% 297 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 294
Splatting 232
80% 244 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$70
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 219 215 198 214 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 460
Write 383
Mixed 240
SusWrite 216
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 35.3
128% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 210
160% 216 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81%
Great: 102%
MB1000EAMZE 1TB
29GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 124
Write 40.3
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 40.2
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 75%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
100GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 110 109 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 134
Write 132
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 110
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
49GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 86 85 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 72.7
Write 75.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 85.9
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.5
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $402
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $220Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $339Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback